The problem
of public leadership is calling into existence a public that can understand and
act on its own interests.
-John Dewey
There is a misconception regarding
public health organizations working to combat the prevalent community health
obstacles of our day. This misconception revolves around the belief that
communities lack the capacity to lead and instead require a benevolent
intervention to ‘put them right’. On the contrary, our communities suffer only
from a lack of an ability to organize its leadership and coordinate its
advocacy. This deficit of structure produces a deficit of purpose. Public
health as a discipline depends most heavily on an extensive network of social
support that empowers a public to purposefully understand and act on its own
health interests.
The days of uninformed
constituencies suffering from poor disease management, a lack of a prevention
and/or promotion plan is over. Empowerment through the Health Promotion
Council’s advocacy work builds community capacity to simultaneously combat
health risk factors and bolster health protective factors. The diversity of services
provided through this advocacy lens grants our communities the knowledge and
organizations the capacity to develop relevant and appropriate prevention/promotion
strategies.
In particular, HPC’s Advocacy
Institute (AI) empowers stakeholders to organize, mobilize, and advocate for
sustainable community change. Through work focused on the connection between
public health and policy, community health, and the implementation of a
strategic advocacy action plan, we prompt participants to call their
communities’ capacity into existence and create healthy change. This innovative
educational program prepares participants to be the change their communities
need as their strategy for action grows and their leadership skills mature.
Ultimately it’s this maturity that facilitates the development of sustainable
community health. HPC’s advocacy work has the potential to ‘put the city right’ by empowering individuals, families,
communities, institutions, and policymakers to call into existence a vision for
health that respects leadership at all levels.
On a personal note, as one of the
primary contributors to the development of AI, I see the program as a vehicle
for capacity building for so many public health stakeholders. From youth
developing leadership skills to school administrators working towards systemic
reform to city policymakers making public health more accessible, these groups are
more like puzzle pieces awaiting transformational leaders. AI engages
stakeholders; primarily youth to this point so that they can see where they
‘fit’ in the picture. To this point, the public health picture has a piece
missing and we are working to convince youth to take their rightful place.
AI has proven to be extremely
enriching for those who have participated from legislative trips to community
events and school seminars. My hope is for participants to find their
individual and collective voices to speak up and their individual and
collective feet to stand up. Ultimately, no one can push youth into their place
as leaders. They’ll have to advocate on their own behalf. Good thing they have
the Advocacy Institute.
No comments:
Post a Comment